Archives March 2015

York – It’s In Our Name.

eb1York – It’s In Our Name.
Our approach is unique.  It’s not what we do, its how we do it.”

We play a fundamental part of York’s community. Our approach is unique because we actually care about the city.  We try our best to work with other organisations and authorities. In doing so, the joined-up approach means more effective ways to pool resources, knowledge and support.

 Who benefits from our approach?

  • The local business community
  • Local authorities
  • Town centre management & Shopping Centre management
  • Police
  • Residents & visitors to the town centre
  • Other agencies and organisations who have a responsibility to ensure our town and city centres are safe and secure.
  • Young people who are criminalised unnecessarily

Aims & Objectives of our approach

  • Reduce business crime and the feeling of vulnerability of crime to members of the public.
  • Help to identify and deter persistent offenders/trouble makers/offenders
  • Using information to increase vigilance in the city
  • Raises the profile and puts positive intervention on the agenda
  • Provide a service that allows more effective use of Police resources
  • Attempt to fulfil our moral obligations to reduce and prevent crime by educating, training and empowering
  • Contribute to securing the future and prosperity of the town/city centre
  • Promotes partnership working with local authorities
  • Promote a general feeling of being safe and secure.

Managing business crime risks has become a critical activity. Crime has a negative effect on the quality and use of our city centre.  These include:

  • Loss of custom due to crime and fear of crime, resulting in a loss in footfall and reduced profit
  • Loss of investment, leading to empty premises
  • Less choice for customers
  • Less employment opportunities
  • Less busy and deserted streets leads to a lowering of people’s perception of safety
  • difficulties in obtaining affordable insurance
  • knock-on effect and downturn for the local economy and community
  • A broken window approach – the more run down an area is, the more crime that happens because offenders assume that no-one is bothered to act.

How our approach contributes to Policing:

  • Emphasis on crime prevention and reducing the opportunity for crime to happen in the first place will potentially allow re-deployment of resources who can focus more serious incidents and other priorities.
  • Local knowledge of known nominal’s for all types of business crime puts us one step ahead.
  • Working very closely with the Police in order to allow a streamlined process for detection and prevention and provides a “best practice” guidance.

To hear more about what we do please feel free to get in touch any time – or 0800 644 1660.

Legal Curiosities: Fact or Fable?

Legal Curiosities: Fact or Fable?

This informal information was produced by the Law Commission’s Statute Law Repeals team to answer some of the queries that they regularly receive about alleged old laws. Most of the curiosities below have no basis in the law as it currently stands, although a few represent the law as it used to be. This list does not purport to be definitive, and readers should not rely on it without conducting their own research. 

It is illegal to enter the Houses of Parliament wearing a suit of armour.

In Force: Yes

The 1313 Statute Forbidding Bearing of Armour forbids members of Parliament from wearing armour in the House.


It is illegal to die in Parliament.

In Force: No

The issue of dying in Parliament appears to arise from the idea that anyone who dies in a Royal Palace is eligible for a state funeral. We have not been able to trace any such law, and neither have the House of Commons authorities. Under the Coroners Act 1988, the coroner of the Queen’s household has jurisdiction over an inquest into a death in a royal palace. However, state funerals are not mandatory. There have been at least four deaths in the grounds of the Palace of Westminster:
– Guy Fawkes and Sir Walter Raleigh were both executed in the Old Palace yard (the present buildings being the New Palace, built after the fire of 1834).
– Spencer Perceval, the only British Prime Minister to be assassinated, was shot and died in the lobby of the House of Commons in 1812.
– Sir Alfred Billson collapsed and died in the House of Commons ‘Aye’ lobby in 1907, while casting his vote on a sugar duty Bill. None of these men received a state funeral. Spencer Perceval’s was a private funeral at his widow’s request.


It is illegal to place a stamp of the Queen upside down on a letter.

In Force: No

The Treason Felony Act 1848 makes it an offence to do any act with the intention of deposing the monarch, but it seems unlikely that placing a stamp upside down fulfils this criterion. The Act itself certainly does not refer to stamps. According to the Royal Mail, it is perfectly acceptable to put a stamp upside-down.


It is illegal to stand within 100 yards of the reigning monarch without wearing socks.

In Force: No

Henry VIII, Mary I and Elizabeth I all passed sumptuary laws, which regulated clothing styles. For example, the 1562 Articles for the Execution of the Statutes of Apparel prohibited anyone from appearing at the royal court wearing shirts with “outrageous double ruffs”, or hose of “monstrous and outrageous greatness”. However, such laws were generally repealed by James I.


It is illegal for a commoner to permit his animal to have carnal knowledge of a pet of the royal household.

In Force: No evidence

This law is usually attributed to George I. However, none of the Acts of his reign relate to royal pets (although the Criminal Law Act 1722, now repealed, did institute the death penalty for killing deer in the royal forests). We can find no evidence of a statute on royal pets from any other period.


It is illegal to harbour a Catholic priest.

In Force: No

The two Acts which made this treasonous were the First Act of Supremacy 1534 and the Treason Act 1534 (under which Thomas More was executed). Both have now been repealed.


It is illegal not to carry out at least two hours of longbow practice a week.

In Force: No

The Unlawful Games Act 1541 required every Englishman between the ages of 17 and 60 (with various exemptions) to keep a longbow and regularly practise archery. However, this Act was repealed by the Betting and Gaming Act 1960.


It is illegal to crack a boiled egg at the sharp end.

In Force: No evidence

This law is usually attributed to Edward VI. However, the only statute of his reign relating to eggs concerned the theft of eggs from birds’ nests, rather than a particular manner of eating them, and it has been repealed. Neither is there evidence of a law on boiled eggs from any other period.
It is worth noting that the question of which way an egg should be broken caused the war between Lilliput and Blefuscu in Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels.


It is illegal to keep a lunatic without a licence.

In Force: No

The Madhouses Act 1774 made it an offence to keep “more than one Lunatick” without a licence for a madhouse. It has now been repealed.


It is illegal to damage grass.

In Force: Not Quite

Not quite The Commons Act 1876 made it an offence to interfere with or disturb a town or village green. The offence is aimed at interruptions to the use of the green, rather than damage to the grass itself. However, damage to a lawn may be covered by general laws on criminal damage.


It is illegal to be drunk on licensed premises.

In Force: Yes

Under s 12 of the Licensing Act 1872, “every person found drunk… on any licensed remises, shall be liable to a penalty”. It is also an offence under the Metropolitan Police Act 1839 for the keeper of a public house to permit drunkenness or disorderly conduct on the premises. Furthermore, under the Licensing Act 2003, it is an offence to sell alcohol to a person who is drunk, or to obtain alcohol for consumption by a person who is drunk.


It is illegal to carry a plank along a pavement.

In Force: Yes

This is an offence under s 54 of the Metropolitan Police Act 1839. Other offences covered by s 54 include flying kites, playing annoying games, and sliding on ice or snow in the street.


It is illegal to beat or shake any carpet or rug in any street. However, beating or shaking a doormat is allowed before 8am.

In Force: Yes

This is an offence under s 60 of the Metropolitan Police Act 1839. In other districts, it is an offence under s 28 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847.

Other offences covered by s 28 include:

– keeping a pigsty in front of your house;

– slaughtering cattle in the street;

– erecting a washing line across the street;

– singing profane or obscene songs or ballads in the street; and

– wilfully and wantonly disturbing people by ringing their doorbells or knocking at their doors.


It is illegal to drive cows down the roadway without the permission of the Commissioner of Police.

In force; Yes

Yes The Metropolitan Streets Act 1867 made it an offence to drive cattle through the streets between 10am and 7pm, except with the permission of the Commissioner of Police.


It is illegal to be drunk in charge of a horse.

In Force: Yes

Under the Licensing Act 1872, it is an offence to be drunk in charge of a carriage, horse, cow or steam engine, or whilst in possession of a loaded firearm.


It is illegal to eat mince pies on Christmas Day.

In Force: No

The only Christmas Day on which eating mince pies was illegal was in 1644, as 25 December that year fell on a legally-mandated day of fasting.
Subsequently, the Long Parliament of the Interregnum banned all celebrations of Christmas (An Ordinance for Abolishing of Festivals, 1647). However, mince pies themselves were never banned, although they were strongly disapproved of as a symbol of the immoral excesses of the festive season. Further legislation was proposed in 1656 to clamp down on illicit Christmas celebrations, but it was never enacted.

Statutes of the Interregnum were held to be invalid following the Restoration of the Monarchy, as they had been passed without Royal Assent. Some statutes were later re-enacted by Charles II, but the 1647 Ordinance that banned Christmas was not amongst them.


It is illegal not to tell the tax man anything you do not want him to know, but legal not to tell him information you do not mind him knowing.

In Force: Not quite

This appears to be a simplification of the Tax Avoidance Schemes Regulations 2006. This requires the disclosure of arrangements securing a tax advantage where those benefiting wish to keep it confidential in order to facilitate repeated benefits: the desire for confidentiality is regarded as a hallmark of an unacceptable tax arrangement.


It is legal to shoot a Welshman with a longbow on Sunday in the Cathedral Close in Hereford; or inside the city walls of Chester after midnight; or a Scotsman within the city walls of York, other than on a Sunday.

In Force: No

It is illegal to shoot a Welsh or Scottish (or any other) person regardless of the day, location or choice of weaponry. The idea that it may once have been allowed in Chester appears to arise from a reputed City Ordinance of 1403, passed in response to the Glyndŵr Rising, and imposing a curfew on Welshmen in the city. However, it is not even clear that this Ordinance ever existed. Sources for the other cities are unclear; Hereford, like Chester, was frequently under attack from Wales during the medieval period. Unlawful killings are today covered by the criminal law; see also Art. 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights on the right to life.


It is illegal to move a body across a parish or county boundary unless a fee is paid and a coffin is used. If a body is moved across private land, it will create a public footpath.

In Force : No

The body of a baby, child or adult may be moved anywhere within England and Wales, without using a coffin and without charge or permission, as long as the work of the coroner is not obstructed. A coroner must, however, consent before the body can be taken out of England and Wales. The belief that fees must be paid on crossing boundaries probably derives from the payment of tolls on old turnpike roads. Bodies do not magically create rights of way over private land


It is legal for a pregnant woman to relieve herself anywhere she likes, including in a policeman’s helmet.

In Force: No

There is no generally applicable offence of urinating in public, although it is often an offence under local byelaws. Local authorities are expected to exercise discretion in deciding whether to prosecute, based on, for example, the nature of the locality and the availability of public toilets nearby. There does not appear to be a specific exemption for pregnant women, but discretion not to charge might be exercised if a pregnant woman were caught short in public. However, it does seem unlikely that a police officer would offer his helmet for the purpose.


It is illegal to flag a taxi if you have the plague.

In Force: Not quite

Under the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984, no person who is known to be suffering from a notifiable disease (including plague) may enter a public conveyance without notifying the driver of the condition. A taxi driver may then agree to convey the passenger, although notice must be given to the local authority afterwards, and the taxi disinfected before the next passenger enters it. A bus driver, however, would not be allowed to convey such a person.


It is illegal to pick up an abandoned package.

In Force: Not quite

Under the Postal Services Act 2000, it is an offence intentionally to open or delay a postal packet. Interfering with someone else’s package may also constitute the tort of conversion or trespass to goods.


It is illegal to destroy or deface money.

In Force: Yes
It is not illegal to deliberately destroy a banknote. However, under the Currency and  Banknotes Act 1928, it is an offence to deface a banknote by printing, stamping or writing on it. The Coinage Act 1971 also makes it an offence to destroy a metal coin that has been current in the UK since 1969, unless a licence to do so has been granted by the Treasury.


It is illegal to handle salmon in suspicious circumstances.

In Force: Yes

This is an offence under the Salmon Act 1986.

All swans are the property of the Queen, and killing one is an act of treason.

In Force; Not quite
Since the 12th century, the Crown has held the right to ownership over all wild, unmarked mute swans in open water. However, the Queen only exercises her right over parts of the Thames and its tributaries. This right is shared with the Vintners’ Company and the Dyers’ Company, livery companies of the City of London.

Every year, the Swan Upping ceremony is carried out by the Crown and the Companies to record and mark all the swans in the area.
Killing one of the Queen’s mute swans may be unlawful, but it has never been an act of treason. Furthermore, tame swans and all other varieties of wild swan (eg whooper and Bewick’s swans) are free.

The head of any dead whale found on the British coast automatically becomes the property of the King, and the tail the property of the Queen.

In Force: Not quite

Under the 14th century statute Prerogativa Regis, all whales and sturgeons found on the coast are the property of the Crown. This law is still in force, although a sturgeon caught in Swansea Bay in 2004 was declined by the royal household, and ended up in the Natural History Museum. (It is worth noting that both whales and sturgeons are now European protected species, and it is illegal to deliberately catch or kill them.)

The idea that the head and tail are to be divided between the King and Queen seems to originate from the 13th century legal treatise known as Bracton. Blackstone in his Commentaries claims that the reason for the rule was to provide the Queen with whalebone for her corset stays. However, as Herman Melville points out in Moby-Dick, this is clearly  incorrect: whalebone, or baleen, is only found in a whale’s mouth.

Customer Surveys completed..

We send out annual service surveys to our customers. This year the results were 100% positive (agree-strongly agree) and some of the comments received include…

“The main reason we come back to your company each year is the level of cooperation and professionalism shown by both staff and management, nothing is too much trouble (which I have no doubt sometimes it is!)”

” Very happy with the service provided and any issues have always been followed up quickly and efficiently!”

 “I would highly recommend Eboracum Security. We have used their service for many of our events and they always go above and beyond. They are totally professional in their approach and have excellent interpersonal skills. “

Our staff are our key to success and I take this opportunity to thank you all ! 


Eboracum staff undergo Advanced Physical Intervention Training

In Feb 2015, we rolled out an advanced physical intervention programme to our employees.

The training is focused on public perception.